GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Gemini 1.5 Flash: AI Model Comparison
Explore the key differences between OpenAI and Google's latest language models
GPT-3.5 Turbo
: specialties & advantages
GPT-3.5 Turbo is known for its versatility and efficiency in natural language processing tasks. It offers a good balance between performance and cost, making it suitable for a wide range of applications.
Key strengths include:
- Fast response times
- Affordable pricing
- Ability to handle various language tasks
- Good performance in general knowledge and conversation
- Context window of 4,096 tokens (16,385 for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16K version)
- Optimized for chat but works well for non-chat tasks
While not as advanced as GPT-4, it remains a popular choice for many developers and businesses due to its accessibility and reliability.
Best use cases for
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Here are examples of ways to take advantage of its greatest stengths:
Chatbots and Virtual Assistants
GPT-3.5 Turbo excels in powering chatbots and virtual assistants, providing quick and coherent responses for customer support and general inquiries.
Content Generation
It's effective for generating various types of content, including blog posts, social media updates, and product descriptions, with good quality and speed.
Language Translation
GPT-3.5 Turbo can perform language translation tasks efficiently, making it useful for multilingual applications and content localization.
Gemini 1.5 Flash
: specialties & advantages
Gemini 1.5 Flash is Google's advanced language model, designed for complex, multi-step tasks. It offers improved capabilities over previous models and GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Key strengths include:
- Multimodal capabilities (text and vision)
- Massive context window of 1 million tokens
- Advanced reasoning and problem-solving abilities
- Improved accuracy in complex tasks
- Enhanced performance in specialized domains
- Support for over 100 languages
- Ability to process one hour of video, 11 hours of audio, or codebases with more than 30,000 lines of code
Gemini 1.5 Flash is particularly well-suited for applications requiring sophisticated analysis, creative problem-solving, and handling of complex information across multiple modalities.
Best use cases for
Gemini 1.5 Flash
On the other hand, here's what you can build with this LLM:
Advanced Data Analysis
Gemini 1.5 Flash's large context window and advanced reasoning capabilities make it ideal for analyzing complex datasets and providing in-depth insights.
Multimodal Applications
With support for both text and vision inputs, Gemini 1.5 Flash excels in applications that require understanding and processing of multiple data types, such as image analysis and visual question-answering.
Large-Scale Information Processing
Gemini 1.5 Flash can process and analyze vast amounts of information, making it suitable for tasks involving large codebases, extensive documents, or long-form content.
In summary
When comparing GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini 1.5 Flash, several key differences emerge:
- Context Window: Gemini 1.5 Flash offers a much larger context window (1 million tokens) compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (4,096 tokens, or 16,385 for the 16K version), allowing for processing of significantly larger data volumes.
- Multimodal Capabilities: Unlike GPT-3.5 Turbo, Gemini 1.5 Flash supports both text and vision inputs, enabling more diverse applications.
- Performance: Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms GPT-3.5 Turbo on various benchmarks, including MMLU (78.9% vs 70% for 5-shot) and HellaSwag (93.3% vs 85.5% for 10-shot).
- Cost: For prompts under 128K tokens, Gemini 1.5 Flash is more cost-effective, with input costs at $0.075 vs $0.50 per million tokens, and output costs at $0.30 vs $1.50 per million tokens.
- Language Support: Gemini 1.5 Flash supports over 100 languages, while GPT-3.5 Turbo's language support may be more limited.
- Release Date: Gemini 1.5 Flash is newer, released on February 15, 2024, compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's initial release on November 28, 2022.
- Knowledge Cutoff: Gemini 1.5 Flash has more recent training data (November 2023) compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (September 2021).
For most complex applications requiring advanced reasoning, multimodal inputs, or processing of large amounts of data, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the superior choice. However, GPT-3.5 Turbo remains a reliable and cost-effective option for many general-purpose tasks and applications where its capabilities are sufficient.
Use Licode to build products out of custom AI models
Build your own apps with our out-of-the-box AI-focused features, like monetization, custom models, interface building, automations, and more!
Enable AI in your app
Licode comes with built-in AI infrastructure that allows you to easily craft a prompt, and use any Large Lanaguage Model (LLM) like Google Gemini, OpenAI GPTs, and Anthropic Claude.
Supply knowledge to your model
Licode's built-in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system helps your models understand a vast amount of knowledge with minimal resource usage.
Build your AI app's interface
Licode offers a library of pre-built UI components from text & images to form inputs, charts, tables, and AI interactions. Ship your AI-powered app with a great UI fast.
Authenticate and manage users
Launch your AI-powered app with sign-up and log in pages out of the box. Set private pages for authenticated users only.
Monetize your app
Licode provides a built-in Subscriptions and AI Credits billing system. Create different subscription plans and set the amount of credits you want to charge for AI Usage.
Accept payments with Stripe
Licode makes it easy for you to integrate Stripe in your app. Start earning and grow revenue for your business.
Create custom actions
Give your app logic with Licode Actions. Perform database operations, AI interactions, and third-party integrations.
Store data in the database
Simply create data tables in a secure Licode database. Empower your AI app with data. Save data easily without any hassle.
Publish and launch
Just one click and your AI app will be online for all devices. Share it with your team, clients or customers. Update and iterate easily.
Browse our templates
StrawberryGPT
StrawberryGPT is an AI-powered letter counter that can tell you the correct number of "r" occurrences in "Strawberry".
AI Tweet Generator
An AI tool to help your audience generate a compelling Twitter / X post. Try it out!
YouTube Summarizer
An AI-powered app that summarizes YouTube videos and produces content such as a blog, summary, or FAQ.
Don't take our word for it
I've built with various AI tools and have found Licode to be the most efficient and user-friendly solution. In a world where only 51% of women currently integrate AI into their professional lives, Licode has empowered me to create innovative tools in record time that are transforming the workplace experience for women across Australia.
Licode has made building micro tools like my YouTube Summarizer incredibly easy. I've seen a huge boost in user engagement and conversions since launching it. I don't have to worry about my dev resource and any backend hassle.
Other comparisons
FAQ
What are the main differences in capabilities between GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini 1.5 Flash?
The main differences in capabilities between GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini 1.5 Flash are:
- Context Window: Gemini 1.5 Flash has a much larger context window (1 million tokens) compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (4,096 tokens, or 16,385 for the 16K version).
- Multimodal Abilities: Gemini 1.5 Flash supports both text and vision inputs, while GPT-3.5 Turbo is text-only.
- Performance: Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms GPT-3.5 Turbo on various benchmarks, including MMLU and HellaSwag.
- Knowledge Cutoff: Gemini 1.5 Flash has more recent training data (November 2023) compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo (September 2021).
- Language Support: Gemini 1.5 Flash supports over 100 languages, while GPT-3.5 Turbo's language support may be more limited.
Which model is more cost-effective for general-purpose tasks?
For general-purpose tasks, the cost-effectiveness depends on the specific use case:
- For prompts under 128K tokens, Gemini 1.5 Flash is more cost-effective, with lower input and output costs compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo.
- For prompts over 128K tokens, the pricing for Gemini 1.5 Flash increases, making it comparable to GPT-3.5 Turbo in terms of cost.
- GPT-3.5 Turbo may still be more cost-effective for simpler tasks that don't require the advanced capabilities or large context window of Gemini 1.5 Flash.
Consider your specific requirements, including prompt length, complexity of tasks, and required capabilities, to determine which model offers the best value for your use case.
How do the models compare in terms of performance benchmarks?
Gemini 1.5 Flash generally outperforms GPT-3.5 Turbo on various benchmarks:
- MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding): Gemini 1.5 Flash scores 78.9% (5-shot) compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo's 70% (5-shot).
- HellaSwag: Gemini 1.5 Flash achieves 93.3% (10-shot) vs GPT-3.5 Turbo's 85.5% (10-shot).
- MMMU (Massive Multitask Multimodal Understanding): Gemini 1.5 Flash scores 62.2% (0-shot), while this benchmark is not available for GPT-3.5 Turbo.
- GSM8K (Grade School Math): Gemini 1.5 Flash scores 90.8% (11-shot), while this benchmark is not available for GPT-3.5 Turbo.
These benchmarks suggest that Gemini 1.5 Flash has superior performance in various language understanding, reasoning, and multimodal tasks, particularly in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.
What are the key factors to consider when choosing between GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini 1.5 Flash for a project?
When choosing between GPT-3.5 Turbo and Gemini 1.5 Flash for a project, consider the following factors:
- Task Complexity: For simple to moderate tasks, GPT-3.5 Turbo may be sufficient. For complex, multi-step problems or advanced reasoning, Gemini 1.5 Flash might be more suitable.
- Input Type: If your project requires processing both text and images, Gemini 1.5 Flash's multimodal capabilities make it the better choice.
- Context Length: For tasks requiring analysis of large documents or extensive conversation history, Gemini 1.5 Flash's larger context window (1M tokens) is advantageous.
- Budget: Consider the pricing structure of both models, especially in relation to your expected token usage.
- Performance Requirements: If your project needs state-of-the-art performance on language understanding and reasoning tasks, Gemini 1.5 Flash's superior benchmark scores may be crucial.
- Integration and API: Consider the ease of integration and API support for each model in your development environment.
- Specific Language Needs: If your project requires support for multiple languages, Gemini 1.5 Flash's broader language support may be beneficial.
Evaluate these factors based on your project's specific requirements to determine which model is the best fit.
How many AI models can I build on my app?
You can build as many models as you want!
Licode places no limits on the number of models you can create, allowing you the freedom to design, experiment, and refine as many data models or AI-powered applications as your project requires.
Which LLMs can we use with Licode?
Licode currently supports integration with seven leading large language models (LLMs), giving you flexibility based on your needs:
- OpenAI: GPT 3.5 Turbo, GPT 4o Mini, GPT 4o
- Google: Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 1.5 Flash
- Anthropic: Claude 3 Sonnet, Claude 3 Haiku
These LLMs cover a broad range of capabilities, from natural language understanding and generation to more advanced conversational AI. Depending on the complexity of your project, you can choose the right LLM to power your AI app. This wide selection ensures that Licode can support everything from basic text generation to advanced, domain-specific tasks such as image and code generation.
Do I need any technical skills to use Licode?
Not at all! Our platform is built for non-technical users.
The drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to build and customize your AI tool, including its back-end logic, without coding.
Can I use my own branding?
Yes! Licode allows you to fully white-label your AI tool with your logo, colors, and brand identity.
Is Licode free to use?
Yes, Licode offers a free plan that allows you to build and publish your app without any initial cost.
This is perfect for startups, hobbyists, or developers who want to explore the platform without a financial commitment.
Some advanced features require a paid subscription, starting at just $20 per month.
The paid plan unlocks additional functionalities such as publishing your app on a custom domain, utilizing premium large language models (LLMs) for more powerful AI capabilities, and accessing the AI Playground—a feature where you can experiment with different AI models and custom prompts.
How do I get started with Licode?
Getting started with Licode is easy, even if you're not a technical expert.
Simply click on this link to access the Licode studio, where you can start building your app.
You can choose to create a new app either from scratch or by using a pre-designed template, which speeds up development.
Licode’s intuitive No Code interface allows you to build and customize AI apps without writing a single line of code. Whether you're building for business, education, or creative projects, Licode makes AI app development accessible to everyone.