GPT-4o Mini vs Claude 3 Haiku: AI Model Comparison
Explore the key differences between OpenAI and Anthropic's latest cost-effective language models
GPT-4o Mini
: specialties & advantages
GPT-4o Mini is OpenAI's cost-efficient small model, designed to make advanced AI capabilities more accessible. It offers impressive performance at a fraction of the cost of larger models.
Key strengths include:
- Multimodal capabilities (text and vision)
- Large context window of 128K tokens
- Strong performance in reasoning tasks
- Improved efficiency and significantly lower cost compared to larger models
- Support for up to 16.4K output tokens per request
- Knowledge cutoff up to October 2023
GPT-4o Mini is particularly well-suited for applications requiring a balance between advanced capabilities and cost-effectiveness.
Best use cases for
GPT-4o Mini
Here are examples of ways to take advantage of its greatest stengths:
High-Volume Data Processing
GPT-4o Mini's large context window and efficiency make it ideal for processing full code bases or extensive conversation histories in applications.
Real-Time Customer Support
Its low latency and cost-effectiveness make GPT-4o Mini perfect for powering fast, real-time customer support chatbots.
Multimodal Applications
With support for both text and vision inputs, GPT-4o Mini is suitable for developing applications that require processing and understanding of multiple data types.
Claude 3 Haiku
: specialties & advantages
Claude 3 Haiku is Anthropic's advanced language model, designed for fast performance and improved capabilities. It offers significant improvements over previous versions and competes with top-tier AI models.
Key strengths include:
- Multimodal capabilities (text and vision)
- Large context window of 200,000 tokens
- Advanced reasoning and problem-solving abilities
- Improved accuracy in complex tasks
- Enhanced performance in specialized domains
- Strong ethical training and safety features
Claude 3 Haiku is particularly well-suited for applications requiring a balance between advanced capabilities and fast performance.
Best use cases for
Claude 3 Haiku
On the other hand, here's what you can build with this LLM:
Advanced Data Analysis
Claude 3 Haiku's large context window and advanced reasoning capabilities make it ideal for analyzing complex datasets and providing in-depth insights quickly.
Multimodal Applications
With support for both text and vision inputs, Claude 3 Haiku excels in applications that require understanding and processing of multiple data types, such as image analysis and visual question-answering.
Real-time AI Assistance
Claude 3 Haiku's fast performance makes it suitable for real-time AI assistance in various applications, from customer support to interactive educational tools.
In summary
When comparing GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Haiku, several key differences emerge:
- Context Window: Claude 3 Haiku offers a larger context window (200,000 tokens) compared to GPT-4o Mini (128,000 tokens), allowing for processing of larger data volumes.
- Speed: Claude 3 Haiku generates outputs at approximately 23 tokens per second, while GPT-4o Mini is faster at around 86.8 tokens per second.
- Maximum Output: GPT-4o Mini can generate up to 16,384 tokens per request, while Claude 3 Haiku is limited to 4,096 tokens.
- Cost: GPT-4o Mini is more cost-effective, with input costs at $0.15 per million tokens and output costs at $0.60 per million tokens, compared to Claude 3 Haiku's $0.25 for input and $1.25 for output per million tokens.
- Performance: Both models perform well on various benchmarks, with GPT-4o Mini showing a slight edge in some areas like MMLU (82.0% vs 75% for 5-shot) and MMMU (59.4% vs 50.2%).
- Ethical Considerations: Claude 3 Haiku has been specifically designed with strong ethical considerations and safety features, which may be advantageous for certain applications.
For most applications requiring a balance between advanced capabilities and cost-effectiveness, GPT-4o Mini appears to be an excellent choice. However, for tasks demanding extensive context processing or where ethical considerations are paramount, Claude 3 Haiku's larger context window and ethical training may be advantageous.
Use Licode to build products out of custom AI models
Build your own apps with our out-of-the-box AI-focused features, like monetization, custom models, interface building, automations, and more!
Enable AI in your app
Licode comes with built-in AI infrastructure that allows you to easily craft a prompt, and use any Large Lanaguage Model (LLM) like Google Gemini, OpenAI GPTs, and Anthropic Claude.
Supply knowledge to your model
Licode's built-in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system helps your models understand a vast amount of knowledge with minimal resource usage.
Build your AI app's interface
Licode offers a library of pre-built UI components from text & images to form inputs, charts, tables, and AI interactions. Ship your AI-powered app with a great UI fast.
Authenticate and manage users
Launch your AI-powered app with sign-up and log in pages out of the box. Set private pages for authenticated users only.
Monetize your app
Licode provides a built-in Subscriptions and AI Credits billing system. Create different subscription plans and set the amount of credits you want to charge for AI Usage.
Accept payments with Stripe
Licode makes it easy for you to integrate Stripe in your app. Start earning and grow revenue for your business.
Create custom actions
Give your app logic with Licode Actions. Perform database operations, AI interactions, and third-party integrations.
Store data in the database
Simply create data tables in a secure Licode database. Empower your AI app with data. Save data easily without any hassle.
Publish and launch
Just one click and your AI app will be online for all devices. Share it with your team, clients or customers. Update and iterate easily.
Browse our templates
StrawberryGPT
StrawberryGPT is an AI-powered letter counter that can tell you the correct number of "r" occurrences in "Strawberry".
AI Tweet Generator
An AI tool to help your audience generate a compelling Twitter / X post. Try it out!
YouTube Summarizer
An AI-powered app that summarizes YouTube videos and produces content such as a blog, summary, or FAQ.
Don't take our word for it
I've built with various AI tools and have found Licode to be the most efficient and user-friendly solution. In a world where only 51% of women currently integrate AI into their professional lives, Licode has empowered me to create innovative tools in record time that are transforming the workplace experience for women across Australia.
Licode has made building micro tools like my YouTube Summarizer incredibly easy. I've seen a huge boost in user engagement and conversions since launching it. I don't have to worry about my dev resource and any backend hassle.
Other comparisons
FAQ
What are the main differences in capabilities between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Haiku?
The main differences in capabilities between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Haiku are:
- Context Window: Claude 3 Haiku has a larger context window (200,000 tokens) compared to GPT-4o Mini (128,000 tokens).
- Speed: GPT-4o Mini is faster, generating about 86.8 tokens per second compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 23 tokens per second.
- Maximum Output: GPT-4o Mini can generate up to 16,384 tokens per request, while Claude 3 Haiku is limited to 4,096 tokens.
- Ethical Training: Claude 3 Haiku has been specifically designed with strong ethical considerations and safety features.
- Performance: Both models perform well on benchmarks, with GPT-4o Mini showing a slight edge in some areas.
Which model is more cost-effective for general-purpose tasks?
For general-purpose tasks, GPT-4o Mini is more cost-effective:
- GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens.
- Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens.
- This makes GPT-4o Mini about 40% cheaper for input tokens and 52% cheaper for output tokens compared to Claude 3 Haiku.
- Despite the lower cost, GPT-4o Mini offers comparable or slightly better performance on many benchmarks.
For most general-purpose tasks that don't require the extensive context window or specialized ethical considerations of Claude 3 Haiku, GPT-4o Mini provides an excellent combination of performance and cost-effectiveness.
How do the models compare in terms of performance benchmarks?
GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Haiku perform well on various benchmarks, with GPT-4o Mini showing a slight edge in some areas:
- MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding): GPT-4o Mini scores 82.0% (5-shot) compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 75% (5-shot).
- MMMU (Massive Multitask Multimodal Understanding): GPT-4o Mini scores 59.4%, while Claude 3 Haiku scores 50.2%.
- HumanEval: GPT-4o Mini achieves 87.2% (0-shot), while this benchmark is not available for Claude 3 Haiku.
- HellaSwag: Claude 3 Haiku scores 85.9% (10-shot), while this benchmark is not available for GPT-4o Mini.
These benchmarks suggest that both models perform well across various language understanding, reasoning, and knowledge-based tasks, with GPT-4o Mini showing a slight edge in some areas despite its lower cost.
What are the key factors to consider when choosing between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Haiku for a project?
When choosing between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Haiku for a project, consider the following factors:
- Context Length: If your project requires processing very large documents or extensive conversation histories, Claude 3 Haiku's larger context window (200,000 tokens) may be advantageous.
- Speed Requirements: For applications needing faster output generation, GPT-4o Mini's higher token generation speed may be preferable.
- Budget: GPT-4o Mini is more cost-effective, making it ideal for projects with budget constraints or high-volume usage.
- Maximum Output Length: If your application needs to generate longer responses in a single request, GPT-4o Mini's higher maximum output (16,384 tokens) might be beneficial.
- Ethical Considerations: If your project requires strong ethical safeguards, Claude 3 Haiku's specific ethical training may be beneficial.
- Performance Requirements: Consider the slight performance edge of GPT-4o Mini on certain benchmarks if your application aligns with these tasks.
- Multimodal Needs: Both models offer multimodal capabilities, supporting text and vision inputs.
- API Integration: Consider the ease of integration with your existing infrastructure and the specific API features offered by OpenAI (for GPT-4o Mini) or Anthropic (for Claude 3 Haiku).
Evaluate these factors based on your project's specific requirements, balancing the need for advanced capabilities with cost-effectiveness, speed, and ethical considerations.
How many AI models can I build on my app?
You can build as many models as you want!
Licode places no limits on the number of models you can create, allowing you the freedom to design, experiment, and refine as many data models or AI-powered applications as your project requires.
Which LLMs can we use with Licode?
Licode currently supports integration with seven leading large language models (LLMs), giving you flexibility based on your needs:
- OpenAI: GPT 3.5 Turbo, GPT 4o Mini, GPT 4o
- Google: Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 1.5 Flash
- Anthropic: Claude 3 Sonnet, Claude 3 Haiku
These LLMs cover a broad range of capabilities, from natural language understanding and generation to more advanced conversational AI. Depending on the complexity of your project, you can choose the right LLM to power your AI app. This wide selection ensures that Licode can support everything from basic text generation to advanced, domain-specific tasks such as image and code generation.
Do I need any technical skills to use Licode?
Not at all! Our platform is built for non-technical users.
The drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to build and customize your AI tool, including its back-end logic, without coding.
Can I use my own branding?
Yes! Licode allows you to fully white-label your AI tool with your logo, colors, and brand identity.
Is Licode free to use?
Yes, Licode offers a free plan that allows you to build and publish your app without any initial cost.
This is perfect for startups, hobbyists, or developers who want to explore the platform without a financial commitment.
Some advanced features require a paid subscription, starting at just $20 per month.
The paid plan unlocks additional functionalities such as publishing your app on a custom domain, utilizing premium large language models (LLMs) for more powerful AI capabilities, and accessing the AI Playground—a feature where you can experiment with different AI models and custom prompts.
How do I get started with Licode?
Getting started with Licode is easy, even if you're not a technical expert.
Simply click on this link to access the Licode studio, where you can start building your app.
You can choose to create a new app either from scratch or by using a pre-designed template, which speeds up development.
Licode’s intuitive No Code interface allows you to build and customize AI apps without writing a single line of code. Whether you're building for business, education, or creative projects, Licode makes AI app development accessible to everyone.