GPT-4o Mini vs Claude 3 Sonnet: AI Model Comparison
Explore the key differences between OpenAI and Anthropic's latest language models
GPT-4o Mini
: specialties & advantages
GPT-4o Mini is OpenAI's cost-efficient small model, designed to make advanced AI capabilities more accessible. It offers impressive performance at a fraction of the cost of larger models.
Key strengths include:
- Multimodal capabilities (text and vision)
- Large context window of 128K tokens
- Strong performance in reasoning tasks
- Improved efficiency and significantly lower cost compared to larger models
- Support for up to 16.4K output tokens per request
- Knowledge cutoff up to October 2023
GPT-4o Mini is particularly well-suited for applications requiring a balance between advanced capabilities and cost-effectiveness.
Best use cases for
GPT-4o Mini
Here are examples of ways to take advantage of its greatest stengths:
High-Volume Data Processing
GPT-4o Mini's large context window and efficiency make it ideal for processing full code bases or extensive conversation histories in applications.
Real-Time Customer Support
Its low latency and cost-effectiveness make GPT-4o Mini perfect for powering fast, real-time customer support chatbots.
Multimodal Applications
With support for both text and vision inputs, GPT-4o Mini is suitable for developing applications that require processing and understanding of multiple data types.
Claude 3 Sonnet
: specialties & advantages
Claude 3 Sonnet is Anthropic's advanced language model, designed for complex tasks and improved reasoning capabilities. It offers significant improvements over previous versions and competes with top-tier AI models.
Key strengths include:
- Multimodal capabilities (text and vision)
- Large context window of 200,000 tokens
- Advanced reasoning and problem-solving abilities
- Improved accuracy in complex tasks
- Enhanced performance in specialized domains
- Strong ethical training and safety features
Claude 3 Sonnet is particularly well-suited for applications requiring sophisticated analysis, creative problem-solving, and handling of complex information across multiple modalities.
Best use cases for
Claude 3 Sonnet
On the other hand, here's what you can build with this LLM:
Advanced Data Analysis
Claude 3 Sonnet's large context window and advanced reasoning capabilities make it ideal for analyzing complex datasets and providing in-depth insights.
Creative Content Generation
With its advanced reasoning abilities, Claude 3 Sonnet excels at producing nuanced and engaging creative content across various formats.
Ethical AI Development
Claude 3 Sonnet's strong ethical training makes it suitable for developing AI applications that require careful consideration of moral and safety implications.
In summary
When comparing GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Sonnet, several key differences emerge:
- Context Window: Claude 3 Sonnet offers a larger context window (200,000 tokens) compared to GPT-4o Mini (128K tokens), allowing for processing of larger data volumes.
- Performance: Both models perform similarly on various benchmarks, with Claude 3 Sonnet slightly outperforming GPT-4o Mini on some tests like MMLU (81.5% vs 82.0% for 5-shot) and MMMU (53.1% vs 59.4%).
- Cost: GPT-4o Mini is significantly more cost-effective, with input costs at $0.15 per million tokens and output costs at $0.60 per million tokens, compared to Claude 3 Sonnet's $3.00 for input and $15.00 for output per million tokens.
- Maximum Output: GPT-4o Mini can generate up to 16.4K tokens per request, while Claude 3 Sonnet is limited to 4,096 tokens.
- Release Date: Claude 3 Sonnet was released earlier (March 4, 2024) compared to GPT-4o Mini (July 18, 2024).
- Knowledge Cutoff: GPT-4o Mini has slightly more recent training data (October 2023) compared to Claude 3 Sonnet (August 2023).
For most applications requiring a balance between advanced capabilities and cost-effectiveness, GPT-4o Mini appears to be an excellent choice. However, for tasks demanding extensive context processing or highly complex reasoning, Claude 3 Sonnet's larger context window and advanced capabilities may be advantageous, despite the higher cost.
Use Licode to build products out of custom AI models
Build your own apps with our out-of-the-box AI-focused features, like monetization, custom models, interface building, automations, and more!
Enable AI in your app
Licode comes with built-in AI infrastructure that allows you to easily craft a prompt, and use any Large Lanaguage Model (LLM) like Google Gemini, OpenAI GPTs, and Anthropic Claude.
Supply knowledge to your model
Licode's built-in RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) system helps your models understand a vast amount of knowledge with minimal resource usage.
Build your AI app's interface
Licode offers a library of pre-built UI components from text & images to form inputs, charts, tables, and AI interactions. Ship your AI-powered app with a great UI fast.
Authenticate and manage users
Launch your AI-powered app with sign-up and log in pages out of the box. Set private pages for authenticated users only.
Monetize your app
Licode provides a built-in Subscriptions and AI Credits billing system. Create different subscription plans and set the amount of credits you want to charge for AI Usage.
Accept payments with Stripe
Licode makes it easy for you to integrate Stripe in your app. Start earning and grow revenue for your business.
Create custom actions
Give your app logic with Licode Actions. Perform database operations, AI interactions, and third-party integrations.
Store data in the database
Simply create data tables in a secure Licode database. Empower your AI app with data. Save data easily without any hassle.
Publish and launch
Just one click and your AI app will be online for all devices. Share it with your team, clients or customers. Update and iterate easily.
Browse our templates
StrawberryGPT
StrawberryGPT is an AI-powered letter counter that can tell you the correct number of "r" occurrences in "Strawberry".
AI Tweet Generator
An AI tool to help your audience generate a compelling Twitter / X post. Try it out!
YouTube Summarizer
An AI-powered app that summarizes YouTube videos and produces content such as a blog, summary, or FAQ.
Don't take our word for it
I've built with various AI tools and have found Licode to be the most efficient and user-friendly solution. In a world where only 51% of women currently integrate AI into their professional lives, Licode has empowered me to create innovative tools in record time that are transforming the workplace experience for women across Australia.
Licode has made building micro tools like my YouTube Summarizer incredibly easy. I've seen a huge boost in user engagement and conversions since launching it. I don't have to worry about my dev resource and any backend hassle.
FAQ
What are the main differences in capabilities between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Sonnet?
The main differences in capabilities between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Sonnet are:
- Context Window: Claude 3 Sonnet has a larger context window (200,000 tokens) compared to GPT-4o Mini (128K tokens).
- Maximum Output: GPT-4o Mini can generate up to 16.4K tokens per request, while Claude 3 Sonnet is limited to 4,096 tokens.
- Performance: Both models perform similarly on benchmarks, with slight variations depending on the specific test.
- Ethical Training: Claude 3 Sonnet has been specifically designed with strong ethical considerations and safety features.
- Knowledge Cutoff: GPT-4o Mini has slightly more recent training data (October 2023) compared to Claude 3 Sonnet (August 2023).
Which model is more cost-effective for general-purpose tasks?
For general-purpose tasks, GPT-4o Mini is significantly more cost-effective:
- GPT-4o Mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens.
- Claude 3 Sonnet costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens.
- This makes GPT-4o Mini roughly 20 times cheaper for input tokens and 25 times cheaper for output tokens compared to Claude 3 Sonnet.
- Despite the lower cost, GPT-4o Mini offers comparable performance on many benchmarks.
For most general-purpose tasks that don't require the extensive context window or specialized capabilities of Claude 3 Sonnet, GPT-4o Mini provides an excellent combination of performance and cost-effectiveness.
How do the models compare in terms of performance benchmarks?
GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Sonnet perform similarly on various benchmarks:
- MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding): GPT-4o Mini scores 82.0 (5-shot) compared to Claude 3 Sonnet's 81.5 (5-shot CoT).
- MMMU (Massive Multitask Multimodal Understanding): GPT-4o Mini scores 59.4, while Claude 3 Sonnet scores 53.1.
- HellaSwag: Claude 3 Sonnet achieves 89.0 (10-shot), while this benchmark is not available for GPT-4o Mini.
- HumanEval: GPT-4o Mini scores 87.2 (0-shot), while this benchmark is not available for Claude 3 Sonnet.
- MATH: GPT-4o Mini scores 70.2 (0-shot), while this benchmark is not available for Claude 3 Sonnet.
These benchmarks suggest that both models perform well across various language understanding, reasoning, and knowledge-based tasks, with GPT-4o Mini showing a slight edge in some areas despite its lower cost.
What are the key factors to consider when choosing between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Sonnet for a project?
When choosing between GPT-4o Mini and Claude 3 Sonnet for a project, consider the following factors:
- Context Length: If your project requires processing very large documents or extensive conversation histories, Claude 3 Sonnet's larger context window (200,000 tokens) may be advantageous.
- Budget: GPT-4o Mini is significantly more cost-effective, making it ideal for projects with budget constraints or high-volume usage.
- Performance Requirements: Both models offer similar performance on benchmarks, with slight variations depending on the specific task.
- Maximum Output: GPT-4o Mini can generate longer responses (up to 16.4K tokens) compared to Claude 3 Sonnet (4,096 tokens).
- Task Complexity: For highly complex, multi-step problems requiring extensive reasoning, Claude 3 Sonnet might be necessary. For most general applications, GPT-4o Mini should be sufficient.
- Ethical Considerations: If your project requires strong ethical safeguards, Claude 3 Sonnet's specific ethical training may be beneficial.
- Multimodal Needs: Both models offer multimodal capabilities, supporting text and vision inputs.
- API Integration: Consider the ease of integration with your existing infrastructure and the specific API features offered by OpenAI (for GPT-4o Mini) or Anthropic (for Claude 3 Sonnet).
Evaluate these factors based on your project's specific requirements, balancing the need for advanced capabilities with cost-effectiveness and scalability.
How many AI models can I build on my app?
You can build as many models as you want!
Licode places no limits on the number of models you can create, allowing you the freedom to design, experiment, and refine as many data models or AI-powered applications as your project requires.
Which LLMs can we use with Licode?
Licode currently supports integration with seven leading large language models (LLMs), giving you flexibility based on your needs:
- OpenAI: GPT 3.5 Turbo, GPT 4o Mini, GPT 4o
- Google: Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 1.5 Flash
- Anthropic: Claude 3 Sonnet, Claude 3 Haiku
These LLMs cover a broad range of capabilities, from natural language understanding and generation to more advanced conversational AI. Depending on the complexity of your project, you can choose the right LLM to power your AI app. This wide selection ensures that Licode can support everything from basic text generation to advanced, domain-specific tasks such as image and code generation.
Do I need any technical skills to use Licode?
Not at all! Our platform is built for non-technical users.
The drag-and-drop interface makes it easy to build and customize your AI tool, including its back-end logic, without coding.
Can I use my own branding?
Yes! Licode allows you to fully white-label your AI tool with your logo, colors, and brand identity.
Is Licode free to use?
Yes, Licode offers a free plan that allows you to build and publish your app without any initial cost.
This is perfect for startups, hobbyists, or developers who want to explore the platform without a financial commitment.
Some advanced features require a paid subscription, starting at just $20 per month.
The paid plan unlocks additional functionalities such as publishing your app on a custom domain, utilizing premium large language models (LLMs) for more powerful AI capabilities, and accessing the AI Playground—a feature where you can experiment with different AI models and custom prompts.
How do I get started with Licode?
Getting started with Licode is easy, even if you're not a technical expert.
Simply click on this link to access the Licode studio, where you can start building your app.
You can choose to create a new app either from scratch or by using a pre-designed template, which speeds up development.
Licode’s intuitive No Code interface allows you to build and customize AI apps without writing a single line of code. Whether you're building for business, education, or creative projects, Licode makes AI app development accessible to everyone.